Power in Different Languages: Power is an individual’s capacity to control others ‘ actions in social and political sciences. The term “authority” is often used for power, which the social structure perceives to be legitimate. This kind of primitive exercise of power is historically endemic to humanity, but the same concept, as social beings, is regarded as good and inherited or given as an aid, move and empower others to achieve their humanistic goals. The interdependencies between two individuals and the world usually arise from these variables.
How to Say Power in 88 Different Languages
| Different Languages | Word Power |
|---|---|
| Albanian | pushtet |
| Basque | power |
| Belarusian | магутнасць |
| Bosnian | moć |
| Bulgarian | мощност |
| Catalan | poder |
| Croatian | vlast |
| Czech | Napájení |
| Danish | strøm |
| Dutch | macht |
| Estonian | võimsus |
| Finnish | teho |
| French | Puissance |
| Galician | poder |
| German | Leistung |
| Greek | εξουσία (exousía) |
| Hungarian | erő |
| Icelandic | Máttur |
| Irish | cumhacht |
| Italian | energia |
| Latvian | jauda |
| Lithuanian | galia |
| Macedonian | моќ |
| Maltese | enerġija |
| Norwegian | makt |
| Polish | moc |
| Portuguese | poder |
| Romanian | putere |
| Russian | мощность (moshchnost') |
| Serbian | снага (snaga) |
| Slovak | moc |
| Slovenian | moč |
| Spanish | poder |
| Swedish | kraft |
| Ukrainian | потужність (potuzhnist') |
| Welsh | pŵer |
| Yiddish | קראַפט |
| Armenian | ուժ |
| Azerbaijani | güc |
| Bengali | ক্ষমতা |
| Chinese Simplified | 功率 (gōnglǜ) |
| Chinese Traditional | 功率 (gōnglǜ) |
| Georgian | ძალა |
| Gujarati | શક્તિ |
| Hindi | शक्ति |
| Hmong | hwj chim |
| Japanese | パワー |
| Kannada | ವಿದ್ಯುತ್ |
| Kazakh | күш |
| Khmer | អំណាច |
| Korean | 힘 (him) |
| Lao | ພະລັງງານ |
| Malayalam | ശക്തി |
| Marathi | शक्ती |
| Mongolian | эрчим хүч |
| Myanmar (Burmese) | စွမ်းအား |
| Nepali | शक्ति |
| Sinhala | බලය |
| Tajik | ҳокимият |
| Tamil | சக்தி |
| Telugu | శక్తి |
| Thai | อำนาจ |
| Turkish | güç |
| Urdu | طاقت |
| Uzbek | elektr |
| Vietnamese | quyền lực |
| Arabic | قوة (qua) |
| Hebrew | כּוֹחַ |
| Persian | قدرت |
| Afrikaans | krag |
| Chichewa | mphamvu |
| Hausa | ikon |
| Igbo | ike |
| Sesotho | matla |
| Somali | xoog |
| Swahili | nguvu |
| Yoruba | agbara |
| Zulu | amandla |
| Cebuano | gahum |
| Filipino | kapangyarihan |
| Indonesian | kekuasaan |
| Javanese | daya |
| Malagasy | fahefana |
| Malay | kuasa |
| Maori | mana |
| Esperanto | potenco |
| Haitian Creole | pouvwa |
| Latin | imperium |
Force and threat of force do not have to be included in power. The “soft power” idea in conjunction with hard power is an illustration of using control without coercion. A big part of the recent sociological discussion about power reflects on the issue of means to make power effective–in other words to do so as much as it can limit and discourage social actions.
The philosopher Michel Foucault viewed power as a structural expression, which requires both restriction and ability, “the complex strategic situation in a given social environment.” The influence or the strength of people to recruit others and to create trust is a reference force. It is focused on the power holder’s charm and interpersonal skills.
A person can be admired due to his personal character and this admiration creates the chance to influence one another. Here the powerful person wants to identify with and be satisfied with these personal qualities. Expert power is the energy of a person deriving from the individual’s talents or qualifications and his or her requirements for these competencies and skills.
In contrast to the others, this type of power is usually very specific and restricted to the specific area in which the expert is taught and schooled. If they are competent and worthy of knowing a problem, offering ideas, making rational decisions and executing them in general, others want to hear them. If people show experience, they seem to have faith and value what they have to say.
For every organization, power is essential. If an individual has control, he has the potential to do something. When managers have no authority, people can easily ignore their orders, but supervisors are more likely to be able to comply with their directives as they can affect a person’s jobs or salary.
